How to Get Mikel Hartsough's Vote: A Young Voter Manifesto

A candidate attempting to become an elected official needs to take a stand on several issues for me to even consider him to have potential. He or she must also be fairly sincere and  speak with unrehearsed rhetoric. A personal issue is the first one that comes to mind, one of the reasons I didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton is her stand against video games. She compared them to tobacco and alcohol, and considered them to be extremely dangerous. A candidate needs to stay away from my music, movies, and videogames. There is already a rating system in place, Hillary just emulated Nancy Reagan to gain some press, not to defend something she believed in. A politician must endorse stem cell research, make no reference to his religion, and regard education as a top priority.  I like a candidate who doesn’t always side with his political party, it shows they care about the issue more than a win for their affiliation.

Then I get to the essentials, I don’t think we should be involved at all in the middle east, our healthcare system still needs to be reformed, and the economy can’t fix itself at this point.  Immigration needs to be regulated more fiercely, I feel that young adults and high-school kids take priority over illegal immigrants in the hard labor job market. Gay marriage is not a high topic of interest to me, but if a candidate is strongly against it I question his priorities. I don’t think that gay marriage should be a high priority in politics, the reason it gets so much attention in this country is because of the religious aspect, and how many religions consider it an abomination, it is not an issue that a government should be concerned with.

Education needs to be regulated more so than it is now, but carefully. Standardized testing can be effective, but not in all scenarios. I believe the ability of a teacher should be judged by their peers and students, not by government and parents. Privatized schools should not receive any kind of federal funding, public schools should take priority over them. The prep school I went to showed no signs of needing funds, the school expanded every year, and tuition increased with its popularity. Granting the school I went to extra funds would not be money well spent. School administrators should be given the same salary as teachers. Lastly when the government deems it necessary to make budget cuts, education should be the last thing that comes to mind.

When a candidate uses devil and god terms to win over an audience, he loses my vote. When the argument comes down to left or right wing agenda, I stop listening. I feel as if too many politicians treat their job as if it’s a win or lose scenario, and don’t concentrate on the people’s best interests.

Mikel Hartsough

Communication Studies 

Wilkes 2013

Eastwood spends halftime promoting America

“It’s Halftime in America” was not a promotional speech for Obama. In my opinion, the commercial was simply a reflection of the American nation. The use of American icons paired with metaphorical dialogue represented the United States while addressing the main issues most are concerned about, the economy and jobs. The purpose of the commercial as I interpreted it was to reach out to everyone watching and provide hope for a better future.

I admit Chrysler’s ad didn’t necessarily promote the product. Instead, the commercial became a unifying device that spoke to the nation without bias. The main argument that seems to be presented in the media is that Chrysler’s commercial was favoring Obama. I think those who consider the commercial to be liberal or in support of Obama are fishing for controversy.

Anyone could just as easily see the ad as anti-Obama; however, I can’t agree that bias was present in any aspect. Because the beginning of the commercial states everything that is wrong in America, it suggests that we need to take a different approach in the next half. With the new election coming up, the second half is about to begin and since Obama is our current president, the ad proposes that he is to blame for a rough first half.

Although I point out that some could interpret the ad to be anti-Obama, I don’t think it was meant to be. Chrysler may have purposely made the commercial questionable to bring extra attention to their company. Since the basis of the commercial appeals to each individual American’s main concerns such as jobs, the economy, and the future of the country, I fully believe the ad was meant to be a patriotic inspirational speech, not a campaign promotion for either party.

Don't believe me? Watch it below.

Devoni Novak
Communication Studies
Wilkes University 2013